downtrend_abstract.html

Section 1

Four tones and downtrend: a preliminary report on pitch realization in a language with four level tones

Bruce Connell

Abstract


One important strand in pitch research in recent years has been concerned with F0 downtrends over the course of an utterance. Despite their obvious importance to this research, relatively little investigation has been done in this respect on African tone languages. Most work that has been done here has focused on languages with two (e.g. Igbo, Hausa) or three (e.g. Yoruba) tones. The existence of languages with multiple tone levels raises some interesting questions with respect to pitch realization, the nature of the (phonetic) tonal space, and the phonological specification of tone. This paper is a preliminary report of an investigation of pitch realization in Mambila, a language with four lexically distinctive tone levels. These tones may be combined to produce several different contours; in addition the language also has grammatical tone. The report is based on recordings of the speech of only two speakers, and as a result conclusions offered are tentative.

The evidence for F0 downtrends in Mambila is different across tones, and where downtrends do occur, it is not yet clear whether these are to be attributed to declination or final lowering. Regardless, any downtrends that do occur are slight; Mambila appears to be a discrete-level language, in that any impingement of one tone in the space of another is rapidly corrected. In some respects, therefore, tone realization in Mambila seems relatively straightforward. In particular, we seem not to be faced with the question of how to model the phonetic effect of downstep carrying on through subsequent tones. The reason given for this relatively uncomplicated aspect of Mambila tone is based in the phonology of Mambila: with the register being relatively crowded, having four level tones and several combinations of these at the lexical level, and with these being potentially subject to modification at the grammatical level, there is accordingly less room for maneuver on other planes. There is, in other words, a trade-off between complexity and simplicity at different levels of the linguistic structure; the only phonetic perturbations the phonology permits are sufficiently small that they do not endanger phonological contrast.

Click here to see the paper

Return to VIMS




Updated Monday, May 27, 1996