IAN FOWLER and DAVID
ZEITLYN (eds), African Crossroads: intersections between history
and anthropology in Cameroon . Cameroon Studies 2, Oxford and
Providence RI: Berghahn, 1996, 213 pp., £30.00, ISBN 1
57181 859 6 hard covers, £11.95, ISBN 1 57181 9266
paperback.
Although this
book’s editors do not present it as a Festschriftto Elizabeth Chilver, in several positive senses
it is. Not only is the work dedicated to the seminal
Grassfields scholar and co-founder of the Cameroon Grassfields
Working Group (GWG), it emerges from a GWG meeting in Oxford at
which the editors ‘took the opportunity to
conspire’, as they put it, to produce a set of essays in
recognition of her lifelong dedication to Grassfield studies.
Furthermore, this volume celebrates Chilver’s influence
on Grassfield studies by emphasising the combination of
historical and anthropological approaches to Grassfield studies
characteristic of her own work.
The book is composed
of nine essays which focus on the late pre-colonial and early
colonial period under the Germans in Cameroon. Fowler and
Zeitlyn usefully prefigure these essays with an introduction
which re-examines the ‘Tikar problem’ regarding the
perplexing claims to Tikar origin among the leaders of many of
the Grassfield kingdoms. Fowler and Zeitlyn place the problem
in the context of kingship in the Grassfields, arguing
convincingly that claims to foreign origin among the elite of
the region must be seen in terms of struggles for authority
which move dynastic models not only backwards in time (the
model common in western Europe) but also outward in space.
Claims to authority are thus paradoxically embedded in myths of
foreign origin in the Grassfields, myths which contribute to
territorialisation and hierarchical stratifications within the
kingdoms.
This fundamental
theme regarding Grassfield models of power is echoed in various
ways by four of the essays which follow. In a detailed
historical analysis Austen presents the mythical aspects of the
Duala middleman relationship with the German administrations,
emphasising the manner in which violent oppression and frequent
confrontation have been reinvented by the Duala over the course
of the century and are now presented as a ‘golden
age’ to be contrasted with the French rule which
followed. Similarly to myths of Tikar origin in the
Grassfields, Austen shows how Duala identity has come to be
inseparable from the mythologies which cluster around the
Duala-German relationship. Just as Tikar (and even
‘Anglo-Saxon’) origin has become intrinsic to
identity in the Grassfields, Germany has been incorporated
within Duala identity. In another historically rich essay, this
time focusing on the Moghamo of the western Grassfields.
O’Niel similarly depicts the ways in which the Germans
were portrayed according to local models of the wild and the
inhuman upon their arrival in the Grassfields in 1889. The
political alignment of the first Germans to reach the area with
Bali-Nyonga was to affect Moghamo villages catastrophically.
O’Niel describes how, by means of this new partnership,
the latter kingdom gained the weapons, the training and the
permission to raid the Moghamo at will for slaves and
‘labour recruits’ for the German plantations on the
coast. Again, as with the Duala, the deep ad lasting impact
which the Germans were to have on the area was represented and
negotiated in terms of local political models of royal might,
animality and the foreign-a model shared by the Bali-Nyonga and
the Moghamo alike.
It was this very
model of power and hierarchy which-thanks to the arrival of the
Germans-was called into question by the rebellions of the male
cadets described by Warnier. In an essay which draws upon his
1993 work L’Esprit de l’enterprise au
Cameroun .
Warnier adds a piece to the puzzle of Grassfield politics which
had been sorely wanting; a description of resistance and
rebellion to kingship and hierarchy to add to the
neo-functionalist analyses which had preceded it and which
systematically ignored everything which seemed inimical to the
system as idealised by palace informants in colonial reports.
In an equally important essay which brings out the aesthetic
dimension of politics in the Grassfields, Geary describes the
astonishing appropriation of German-style military costumes by
the Bali-Nyonga and Bamum courts at the turn of the century.
She reveals how the struggle for power inherent in the
relations between the early German administration and its
chosen middlemen in the region was physically negotiated by
means of the appropriation of the uniforms of colonial officers
or local reinventions of them. Geary convincingly
contextualises the collection of these exotic costumes within
Grassfields systems of accumulation and redistribution of
objects of material culture from foreign kingdoms. She also
highlights the way in which the gifts of military regalia the
Germans made to the Bamum eventually threatened to backfire on
them as the Bamum, having literally incorporated this new
source of external power, gained influence in the
region.
The remaining five
essays leave issues regarding political cosmology aside and
concentrate squarely on historical and religious issues. Fardon
opens the volume with a discussion of Bali identity in the
Grassfields, tracing the origins of the Bali from Chamba-Leko
speakers in present-day Nigeria and examining the ways in which
that identity is now under renegotiation to suit the demands of
‘modernity’. Fanso and Chem-Langhêê
contribute a short piece on Nso’ warfare at the turn of
the century. Burnham contributes an essay on the agonistic
relation between the Gbaya and the more powerful Fulbe of the
Haute Sangha region of Cameroon. He reveals that the French,
under the hopelessly ill-advised Brazza, raided the Gbaya in an
attempt to ingratiate themselves with the Fulbe
‘nobility’ by subduing their ‘pagan’
enemies. Burnham reveals that a static historical model of the
region was favoured by the French administration, since it lent
credence to their presumption of Fulbe supremacy. Finally,
Banadzem and Tardits both contribute work on religion in the
Grassfields. Banadzem writes on Nso’ traditional beliefs
and the introduction and partial success of the ‘world
religions’ to the kingdom. Tardits offers a detailed
analysis of a religion of salvation elaborated under the
prolific King (later Sultan) Njoya, an original doctrine
influenced by syncretised elements from both the Islamic and
the Christian traditions with which he became familiar during
the course of his reign.
Though in many ways a
highly specialist collection of essays, this volume
nevertheless cannot be contained within the boundaries of
‘area studies’. In its serious attention to
historical detail, its questioning of received wisdom regarding
African political models and their relation to globalisation
and the emerging nation state, this work provides yet more
evidence of the vigorous state of Grassfield studies today-a
vigour fostered in no small way by Elizabeth
Chilver.
NICOLAS
ARGENTI
University of East
Anglia