Marriage Strategies, Resistance and
Stratification
Not all women lack
access to resources, and not all are precluded from
participation in the wage or salaried sector. Clearly the new
elite households include women. Just as marriage was a male
strategy of accumulation in pre-colonial Nso', so it is today.
Women's production and reproduction continue to support male
investment and status. The current context has, however,
shifted the focus of these strategies and brought new
opportunities for women. Increasingly, women are receiving
education at all levels. Parents often see their daughters'
education as an investment that will be repaid by their
daughter's husband in bridewealth and other services. Educated
men marry educated women, and bridewealth, by matching 'like
with like', comes to operate in the same way that dowry does,
encouraging the combining of resources among elites. Elite
women, too, assume primary responsibility for provisioning the
household but, unlike their non-elite sisters, they have access
to resources which allow them to contribute directly in cash to
total household accumulation. Elite men are apt to invest in
their wives' careers and enterprises, either by paying
education or training expenses or by lending them money for
business ventures. Women married to elite men often have
salaried jobs and are, in addition, able to invest more
substantially in trade and to hire labour on their farms.
Marriage practices continue to form the base of accumulation
for men and are, in addition, an important factor in the
formation of elite groups.
The following is a
short description of a typical rural elite marriage.
V. told me that a
good husband is one who not only gives money to the household
and pays school fees, but who will also discuss plans with his
wife and listen to her point of view. She and her husband have
a marriage which is fairly typical of the new rural elite. Her
husband is the headmaster of a village primary school. She
married at age 19, had two children, became the secretary of
the local women's cooperative, did some petty trading in
prepared foodstuffs and worked a slightly larger than average
farm. After the birth of her third child, at age 28, she
decided to return to school to get a teacher's certificate. Her
husband was instrumental in her return by providing
encouragement and financing. When V. finished college she and
her husband both found employment teaching in Kumbo, where they
began to build a large modern cement-block house, and had four
more children. With the help of her daughter and some
relatives, whom she pays in cash and a percentage of the crops,
V. continues to farm in their home village, spending school
vacations on her farm. Using some of her salary, she has become
quite successful as a petty trader buying produce from women in
the small market in her village and selling it in the larger
market in Kumbo. Her eldest daughter is now in secondary
school, and she and her husband are hoping that this daughter,
and all their children, will be able to go to college or even
to university. While V. and her husband keep separate accounts,
they pool their resources at critical times in order to pursue
their shared vision of a modern lifestyle. This has enabled
them to put together a distinctively elite lifestyle, denoted
by the clothes they wear, their house and furnishings, and an
emphasis on cleanliness and neatness in their presentation of
self.
Elite women as well
as men can now accrue symbolic capital in the form of
education. Women with a minimum of a secondary school education
now seek salaried employment. Educated men and women marry each
other and may combine interests and resources to accumulate
resources to permit a distinctive elite lifestyle marked by the
ability to consume and display 'western' or 'modern' consumer
goods. An important aspect of symbolic capital in Nso' today is
that it includes new forms of cultural capital, represented by
access to education and jobs which, if not gender blind, are
accessible to males and females, but only among a small
elite.
Given their history
of protest, it is not surprising that in the current economic
crisis women are beginning to rebel against what they see as an
economic system put together and run by men which increasingly
pressures and burdens women. Men are challenged to provide more
help to women or risk both the withdrawal of female support and
a takeover of economic resources by women. As 'The Cameroonian
Woman in Development' states:
we [women] intend to
fight the economic crises whose structure and origin are
masculine , [emphasis added] by doing our utmost to buy,
sell, own and control. In all this we shall always welcome
men's advice and assistance, but only when solicited. One area
we plan to be careful of, and that is our purses. We plan to
keep the menfolk away from them. We may of course assist in
paying their taxes to avoid being left in the cold when they
are locked up, but we shall strive to let no franc of our sweat
be drained into a tumbler of beer.'... (Wendi 1990)
In this we hear
echoes of earlier women's protests in this part of Cameroon.
The article is not radically feminist, but rather argues that
times have changed, that men are not dealing with changing
circumstances very well and that women are increasingly
marginalized and unable to adequately feed their families. This
document echoes the womens' view of men with which I began this
paper.
We can see in young
women's attitudes towards marriage and marriage strategies a
sign of their current impatience with men. Many young women who
have been educated beyond primary school and who have access to
employment other than farming are choosing to stay single. They
say they want to 'have something of their own' before they make
a decision about marriage; they rhetorically ask, 'why should
we get married and just work farm?'. Most of these single women
have children, for this remains the mark of adulthood. They may
continue to live in their father's compound, and may help their
mothers with farming on weekends in exchange for childcare
during the week.
These young women are
not rejecting men entirely nor making a decision to stay single
forever. But they are not willing to exchange their middle
class status for a non-elite marriage. They have more options
than their less fortunate non-elite friends, many of whom also
do not wish only to farm, are unmarried and commonly referred
to as 'second-hand.' Without family support,aan unmarried
mother is in an unenviable position. For women whose families
have few resources, this resistance is likely to result in a
less desirable lifestyle. It may even lead to the feminization
of poverty in rural villages since the trend for young women to
resist traditional marriage arrangements is likely to effect
the future of subsistence farming. Womens' marriage strategies
have the potential to change the configuration of male power
which depends so substantially on the ability and willingness
of women to provision their husband's household and underwrite
male accumulation.
Return to the Paideuma Contents page
Return to the 'Mama for story'
page